Partnership Grants—Stage 1: February 2026 Competition

Overview
Value	Stage 1: up to $30,000 Stage 2 (by invitation only): up to $2.5 million
Duration	4 to 7 years
Application deadline	February 10, 2026, 8:00 p.m. (eastern)
Results announced	June 2026
Apply	Web CV, application and instructions

On this page

• Webinar
• Description
• Value and duration
• Eligibility
• Application process
• Merit review
• Regulations, policies and related information
• Contact information

Webinar

Description

Partnership Grants are expected to respond to the objectives of the Research partnerships program. Proposals exclusively for partnered research training initiatives are expected to respond, instead, to the objectives of the Research training and talent development program.

These grants provide support for new and existing formal partnerships over four to seven years to advance research, research training and/or knowledge mobilization in the social sciences and humanities. This is done through mutual cooperation and sharing of intellectual leadership, as well as through resources such as cash and/or in-kind contributions.

Partnership Grants are intended for large teams of postsecondary institutions and/or organizations of various types that work in formal collaboration.

The quality of training, mentoring and employability plans for students and emerging scholars will be evaluated as an important part of the proposed initiative. SSHRC’s Guidelines for effective research training explain how students and emerging scholars can meaningfully participate in proposed initiatives.

The intellectual leadership and governance for a new or existing formal partnership can come from the research community and/or partner organizations from the public, private and not-for-profit sectors. However, only an institution that meets the institutional eligibility requirements can administer the grant funding. For more information, see Eligibility.

SSHRC’s Partnerships Tool-Kit offers tools and resources to assist in the planning and implementation of your partnership.

Types of partnerships

There are two categories of partnerships that can request support:

• existing partnerships to foster new research and/or research-related partnership activities that are distinct from the partnership’s previous/ongoing partnership activities; and
• new partnerships to foster new research and/or research-related partnership activities that are undertaken by partnerships in their initial stages.

Here is a list of possible formal partnership approaches. Applicants are not limited to these approaches and are welcome to combine some of the features described below:

• Disciplinary and interdisciplinary research partnerships: Interinstitutional research initiatives designed to make a significant contribution to advancing knowledge and understanding in the social sciences and/or humanities. While SSHRC welcomes proposals for interdisciplinary research partnerships involving natural sciences, engineering and/or health partner organizations, proposed partnerships must follow SSHRC’s subject matter eligibility guidelines.
• Cross-sector co-creation of knowledge and understanding: These partnerships use ongoing collaboration and mutual learning to foster innovative research, training and the co-creation of new knowledge on critical issues of intellectual, social, economic and cultural significance.
• Networks for research and/or related activities: These networks are designed to advance the innovative co-creation of knowledge, as well as training and mobilization of research, on critical issues of intellectual, social, economic and cultural significance.
• Partnered knowledge mobilization: These partnerships are designed to synthesize, apply and mobilize new and existing social sciences and humanities research knowledge in accessible ways to build institutional capacity and increase the national and international impact and stature of Canadian research.
• Partnered chairs: These partnerships nominate research chairs designed to advance research and/or related activities in a specific social sciences and/or humanities area. Partner organizations pool financial resources and suggest an amount of funds required from SSHRC. Proposals must show that a formal agreement exists between the partner organizations to maintain the chair position for a minimum of four years. Proposals must include the name of the suggested chairholder. For more information, see SSHRC’s Guidelines for partnered chairs.
• Partnered research centres: These partnerships create or support a research centre designed to advance research and/or related activities in a specific social sciences and/or humanities area. Partner organizations pool financial resources and suggest an amount of funds required from SSHRC. Proposals must demonstrate that a formal agreement exists between the partner organizations to maintain the centre for a minimum of four years.
• Partnered research training initiatives: These partnerships are designed to support the creation of innovative approaches that enrich research training experiences for students and postdoctoral researchers while enabling their transition to academic or non-academic workplace settings. For more information, see SSHRC’s Guidelines for partnered research training initiatives. These guidelines apply only to proposals that focus primarily on research training and must respond to the objectives of the Research training and talent development program.

SSHRC welcomes applications involving Indigenous research, as well as those involving research-creation.

Joint initiatives

SSHRC collaborates with organizations from across the not-for-profit, private and public sectors to support and promote training, research and connection activities in the social sciences and humanities. SSHRC’s joint initiatives are designed to reflect its strategic objectives and mandate, inform decision-makers and, in certain cases, address specific needs of its partners.

The following joint initiatives are available for this funding opportunity at Stage 2:

• John R. Evans Leaders Fund
• Mitacs Accelerate

Value and duration

Partnership Grants undergo a two-stage merit review process. This funding opportunity description applies to Stage 1 applications. Only applicants successful in the Partnership Grants—Stage 1 process are invited to apply at Stage 2.

Stage 1: Applicants successful at Stage 1 are awarded grants valued at up to $30,000. These funds help applicants prepare the Stage 2 application.

Stage 2 (by invitation only): Using the funds awarded in a successful Stage 1 application, Stage 2 applicants:

• further refine the question(s) to be addressed;
• establish partnership arrangements, a governance structure and/or an approach/methodology; and
• consolidate their collaborative activities.

Partnership Grants awarded at Stage 2 are valued at up to $500,000 per year over four to seven years, up to a total of $2.5 million.

Salary research allowance

A salary research allowance can be requested for not-for-profit organizations involved in the partnership with a project director, co-director or co-applicant on the team to release them from duties to their organization.

Eligibility

Subject matter

Most SSHRC funding is awarded through open competitions. Proposals can involve any disciplines, thematic areas, approaches or subject areas eligible for SSHRC funding. See the guidelines on subject matter eligibility for more information.

Projects whose primary objective is curriculum development, preparation of teaching materials, program evaluation, digitization of a collection or creation of a database are not eligible for funding under this funding opportunity.

Applicants

Partnership Grants are institutional grants. Applications must be submitted by an eligible Canadian institution (the host institution). While the host institution is the applicant, the project director prepares the application on behalf of the host institution and the formal partnership. The project director must be affiliated with the host institution. The term “institution” from this point on refers to both postsecondary institutions and not‑for‑profit organizations.

Project directors who have received a SSHRC grant of any type but have failed to submit an achievement report by the deadline specified in their notice of award are not eligible to apply for another SSHRC grant until they have submitted the report.

Postdoctoral researchers are eligible to be project directors if they have formally established an affiliation with the eligible institution within five months of the grant start date and maintain such an affiliation for the duration of the grant period. Before applying, postdoctoral researchers must confirm with their institution’s research grants officer that the institution can administer the funding, if awarded.

Students enrolled in a program of study are not eligible to apply as project directors. However, a PhD candidate is eligible to apply as a project director if they:

• meet all requirements for the PhD before the grant is awarded, including all course work and successful defence of their dissertation; and
• establish a formal affiliation with the eligible Canadian institution within five months of the grant start date and maintain this affiliation for the duration of the grant period.

Federal scientists who are affiliated with a Canadian postsecondary institution must show that their proposed research or research-related activity is not related to either the mandate of their employer or the normal duties for which they receive payment from that employer.

If the proposal falls within the mandate of the federal government and the research or research-related activity is performed in government facilities, funding can only be allocated for student salaries, stipends and travel costs.

Institutions

Only an eligible Canadian postsecondary institution or not-for-profit organization can administer grant funds. Institutions or not-for-profit organizations interested in administering SSHRC individual or institutional grants must meet the institutional eligibility requirements for the administration of grants and awards, which is independent of this application process.

Institutions and not-for-profit organizations seeking institutional eligibility or that have questions are strongly encouraged to contact SSHRC’s institutional eligibility team at least 10 business days before the application deadline.

Co-directors and co-applicants

Individuals are eligible to be co-directors and co-applicants if they are formally affiliated with any of the following:

• Canadian: eligible postsecondary institution; not-for-profit organization; philanthropic foundation; think tank; or municipal, territorial or provincial government.
• International: postsecondary institution.

Postdoctoral researchers who are affiliated with a postsecondary institution are eligible to be co-directors or co-applicants.

PhD candidates are eligible to be co-directors or co-applicants under the same conditions as those described for a project director.

Collaborators

Any individual who makes a significant contribution to the project is eligible to be a collaborator. Collaborators do not need to be affiliated with an eligible Canadian postsecondary institution.

Individuals from the private sector or federal government can only participate as collaborators.

Partner organizations

Partner organizations can be Canadian or international institutions or organizations of any type (public, private, not-for-profit).

Multiple applications and holding multiple awards

See SSHRC’s regulations on Multiple applications for grants, fellowships and scholarships for more information.

Monitoring

Grant holders will be expected to report on the use of grant funds, on funded activities undertaken during the grant period, and on outcomes. Successful applicants will be informed of reporting requirements upon receiving their notice of award.

Application process

Project directors must complete the application form in accordance with the accompanying application instructions. Applications must be submitted electronically by an authorized research grants officer, or equivalent, from the host institution, or by a representative of the not-for-profit organization who has financial signing authority and is not participating in the project.

Only those applicants who are successful in Stage 1 will be invited to apply in Stage 2.

Project directors needing help while preparing their application should communicate with SSHRC well in advance of the application deadline.

Requirements

Applications must show the following:

Quality and commitment of formal partnerships

If invited to submit a Stage 2 application, applicants should include relevant documentation to allow informed evaluation of the quality and level of commitment of the proposed formal partnerships.

Applicants must include evidence of formal partnership in their application. Evidence may include, but is not limited to:

• governance frameworks
• agreements (intellectual property, conflict resolution, etc.)
• strategic plans
• other relevant documentation

Institutional and partner organization contributions

Stage 1

In Stage 1, applicants must include a proposed plan to secure, over and above the budget requested from SSHRC, a minimum of 35% in additional cash and/or in-kind contributions from sources other than SSHRC during the term of the grant (four to seven years). For example, if $1 million is requested from SSHRC, a minimum of $350,000 in additional contributions must be secured from partner organizations, bringing the actual project budget total to $1.35 million. SSHRC recognizes that the project can grow beyond the original planned amount as additional partner organizations become involved over the duration of the grant.

Stage 2

Applicants invited to submit a Stage 2 application must show that they have already started to confirm the 35% minimum additional cash and/or in-kind contributions and indicate how they will secure the remaining resources during the term of the grant. The host institution must submit reports documenting both their partner organizations’ engagement and their progress in meeting the requirements for partner organization contributions. By the mid-term evaluation (halfway through the grant period), the 35% minimum additional cash and/or in-kind contributions must be confirmed for the rest of the grant period. If this amount is not secured by that time, SSHRC will withhold the remaining grant payments until it receives confirmation that the minimum additional contributions have been secured.

For more information, see SSHRC’s Guidelines for cash and in-kind contributions.

Merit review

Applications are reviewed, and available funds awarded, through a competitive merit review process. SSHRC bases funding decisions on the recommendations of the merit review committee and on the funds available. Committee discussions are guided by the principle of minimum essential funding.

Applications for both Stage 1 and Stage 2 are reviewed by multidisciplinary committees that include relevant expertise from the academic community, as well as research expertise from the public, private and/or not-for-profit sectors. The exact number and composition of merit review committees will be determined by the number and nature of proposals received. Steps specific to each stage are as follows.

Stage 1

• Stage 1 applications are reviewed by a multidisciplinary merit review committee. Based on an assessment of relative merit, the committee provides SSHRC with funding recommendations.
• Applicants successful in Stage 1 are awarded a grant of up to $30,000 to help them prepare a Stage 2 application.

Stage 2

• Expert review panels assess the strengths and weaknesses of each proposal using the evaluation criteria. The assessment of each proposal will be tailored to its nature and complexity. SSHRC will seek, but cannot guarantee, a minimum of three experts to review and comment on each proposal. Written external reviews can be used where an expert review is not possible or where supplementary insights are needed.
• The multidisciplinary merit review committee reviews the applications and reports from expert reviews, and based on an assessment of relative merit, provides SSHRC with funding recommendations. The review process involves a written response to the expert review. The merit review committee will be asked to ensure that the applications recommended for funding provide a rich portfolio of investments of various sizes and across diverse fields, as well as approaches to partnered research and related activities.

Indigenous research

SSHRC’s Guidelines for the merit review of Indigenous research are relevant for researchers (applicants and project directors) and students preparing SSHRC applications related to Indigenous research. SSHRC provides these guidelines to merit reviewers to help build understanding of Indigenous research and research-related activities, and to assist committee members in interpreting SSHRC’s specific evaluation criteria in the context of Indigenous research. SSHRC relies on a community of merit reviewers with experience and expertise in Indigenous research to judge the extent to which the guidelines can be applied to a particular research proposal. The guidelines can also be useful to external assessors, postsecondary institutions and partner organizations that support Indigenous research.

Equity, diversity and inclusion

Equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) requirements have been introduced as part of a pilot initiative in the Partnership Grants funding opportunity. Applicants are required to consider both EDI in research practice (EDI-RP) and EDI in research design (EDI-RD):

• EDI-RP involves promoting diversity in team composition and trainee recruitment; fostering an equitable, inclusive and accessible research work environment for team members and trainees; and highlighting diversity and equity in mentoring, training and access to development opportunities.
• EDI-RD involves designing the research so that it takes EDI into account through approaches such as intersectionality, gender-based analysis Plus, anti-racist approaches and disaggregated data collection, as well as analysis that includes consideration of diversity and identity factors such as, but not limited to, age, culture, disability, education, ethnicity, gender expression and gender identity, immigration and newcomer status, Indigenous identity, language, neurodiversity, parental status/responsibility, place of origin, religion, race, sexual orientation and socio-economic status.

EDI-RP and EDI-RD will be evaluated as part of the Challenge and Feasibility evaluation criteria as outlined below. Applicants should embed consideration of EDI-RP and EDI-RD throughout the relevant sections of the application, as applicable.

For more information, see the Guide to addressing equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in partnership grant applications.

Evaluation criteria and scoring

The following criteria and scoring scheme are used to evaluate the applications:

1. Challenge—The aim and importance of the endeavour (40%):
   • originality, significance and expected contribution to knowledge;
   • appropriateness of the literature review;
   • appropriateness of the theoretical approach or framework;
   • appropriateness of the methods/approach (including the co-creation of knowledge);
   • appropriateness of considerations related to equity, diversity and inclusion in the research design, as applicable (e.g., questions, methods, theoretical framework, literature review, analysis and interpretation, and knowledge mobilization activities);
   • quality of training and mentoring to be provided to students, emerging scholars and other highly qualified personnel, as well as opportunities for them to contribute, and quality of equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in the recruitment, training and mentoring plan;
   • potential for the project results to have influence and impact within and/or beyond the social sciences and humanities research community; and
   • identification of progress indicators.
2. Feasibility—The plan to achieve excellence (30%):
   • appropriateness of the proposed timeline and probability that the objectives will be met;
   • quality and genuineness of the formal partnership and associated management and governance arrangements and leadership, including involvement of partner organizations and others in the design and conduct of the research and/or related activities;
   • expertise of the team and appropriateness of partner organizations in relation to the proposed project;
   • quality of the equity, diversity and inclusion plan for promoting a diverse team, inclusive working environment and equitable opportunities within the partnership;
   • quality of the proposed contribution plan for leveraging of cash and in-kind support from the host institution and/or from partner organizations; and
   • quality and appropriateness of the knowledge mobilization plans, including effective dissemination, exchange and engagement with stakeholders within and/or beyond the research community, where applicable.
3. Capability—The expertise to succeed (30%):
   • quality, quantity and significance of past experience and published and/or creative outputs of the project director and any co-directors or co-applicants, relative to their role in the partnership, and to the stage of their career;
   • evidence of other knowledge mobilization activities (e.g., films, performances, commissioned reports, knowledge syntheses, experience in collaboration / other interactions with stakeholders, contributions to public debate and the media) and of impacts on professional practice, social services and policies, etc.;
   • quality and quantity of past contributions to the training and mentoring of students, postdoctoral researchers and other highly qualified personnel; and
   • past experience in formal partnerships.

Scoring table

Merit review committee members assign a score for each of the three criteria above, based on the following scoring table. The appropriate weighting is then applied to arrive at a final score. Applications must receive a score of 3.0 or higher for each of the three criteria to be recommended for funding.

Communication of results

SSHRC makes competition results available to project directors (via the SSHRC Extranet for Applicants) and institutions (via the Grants and Scholarships Administration Portal).

All project directors will be provided, in addition to SSHRC’s notice of decision, any external assessments received, and a summary of the merit review committee’s evaluation of their proposal, where applicable.

Regulations, policies and related information

SSHRC reserves the right to determine the eligibility of applications based on the information included. SSHRC also reserves the right to interpret the regulations and policies governing its funding opportunities.

All applicants and grant holders must comply with the Regulations Governing Grant Applications and the regulations set out in the Tri-agency Guide on Financial Administration. Applicants are advised to consult the Use of grant funds section of the Tri-agency Guide on Financial Administration to determine whether an expenditure is an appropriate use of grant funds.

Grant holders must also comply with the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications (see the Open Access overview for more information) and the Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy, which replaced SSHRC’s Research Data Archiving policy for all active grants as of April 1, 2021.

All applicants and grant holders must also comply with the Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern.

Specific rules for the use of grant funds

• Grant funds can be used to compensate project coordinator/manager positions, with three restrictions:
  • they cannot be a participant on the funded project;
  • they cannot be paid for administrative services that the institution normally provides; and
  • they cannot be paid to conduct research activities.
• Grant funds cannot be used to remunerate team members regardless of an individual’s eligibility to apply for grants*. This includes postdoctoral fellows serving in any capacity as a member of the team.

  *Exception to the above rule: In some cases, Indigenous team members may be compensated. For more information, see the Tri-agency guideline on remuneration for Indigenous people participating in funded projects. In such cases, the team member may not be delegated to authorize grant expenditures, and under no circumstances is the applicant/project director eligible to be compensated from grant funds.

• Grant funds cannot be used for course release time to allow an individual to engage in research activities.
• Grant funds can be used for consulting fees for expert and/or professional and technical services that contribute directly to the proposed research activities, as long as the service is not being provided by a team member or an individual whose status would make them eligible to hold a SSHRC grant.

Guidelines and related support material

All applicants for SSHRC funding should consult the following guidelines while preparing their application:

• SSHRC’s Definitions of terms for terms used in the grant application process;
• SSHRC’s Guidelines for effective research training, which can also be useful to reviewers and postsecondary institutions;
• SSHRC’s Indigenous Research Statement of Principles and Guidelines for the merit review of Indigenous research for applications involving Indigenous research;
• SSHRC’s Guide to addressing equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in partnership grant applications;
• SSHRC’s definition of knowledge mobilization and Guidelines for effective knowledge mobilization for guidance on connecting with research users to create impact; and
• SSHRC’s Guidelines for support of tools for research and related activities for applicants requiring funding for research and research-related tools.

Contact information

For more information, contact:

Email: partnershipgrants@sshrc-crsh.gc.ca
Toll-free: 1-855-275-2861