Language selection

Search


Appearance at the Standing Committee on Science and Research
Briefing material

Archived information

Archived information is provided for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It is not subject to Government of Canada web standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Contact us to request a format other than those available.

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

On this page


Purpose

On May 28, 2024, the SSHRC President will appear before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Science and Research (SRSR), to deliver opening remarks and answer questions in support of the committee’s study on science and research in Canada's Arctic in relation to climate change. The full scope of the study is:

Also appearing before the committee during the same meeting:

Background

The mandate of the committee includes, among other things, reviewing and reporting on all issues relating to science and research, including any reports of the Chief Science Advisor, and any other matter which the House refers to the standing committee.

On May 7, 2024, the committee elected a new Chair, MP Valerie Bradford, who replaces the outgoing Chair, MP Lloyd Longfield (see Annex A for the committee membership).

The first two meetings of the study on Science and Research in Canada's Arctic in Relation to Climate Change took place on May 9 and 21, 2024 (see Annex B for the list of witnesses and member questions).

The SRSR Committee has so far agreed to undertake studies on the following topics:

Study Topic Study Status

Small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs)

Completed

Successes, challenges, and opportunities for science in Canada

Completed

Attracting and retaining top talent at Canadian post-secondary institutions

Completed

Research and scientific publication in French

Completed

International moonshot programs

Completed

Role and value of citizen scientists

Completed

Commercialization of intellectual property

Completed

Government of Canada graduate scholarship and post-doctoral fellowship programs

Completed

Integration of indigenous traditional knowledge and science in government policy development

Report pending

Long-term impacts of the gender and diversity pay gap for faculty at Canadian universities

Completed

Use of federal government research and development grants, funds, and contributions by Canadian universities and research institutions in partnerships with entities connected to the people’s republic of China

Completed

The distribution of federal government funding among Canada’s post-secondary institutions

Report pending

Science and Research in Canada's Arctic in Relation to Climate Change

Ongoing

Big Science (site visits to large research infrastructure projects)

Not started

Opening remarks

Opening Remarks for Ted Hewitt, President Social Science and Humanities Research Council

Appearance before the Standing Committee on Science and Research Science and Research in Canada's Arctic in Relation to Climate Change

Ottawa, Ontario
May 28, 2024
11:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M.

[ Check against delivery ]

Thank you for the opportunity to address the Committee, Madam Chair, as President of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, or SSHRC, and as Chair of the Steering Committee for the Tri-agency Institutional Programs Secretariat, (TIPS), both of which work closely with the other federal research funding agencies on various Arctic-related research initiatives.

As you know, communities across Northern Canada—many of which are Indigenous—are among the most vulnerable to climate change. They are witnessing first-hand the devastating impacts a changing climate is having across Arctic ecosystems, livelihoods, health, Indigenous culture and a traditional way of life that has existed for generations.

This reality reinforces the importance of research, including interdisciplinary work, to address the complex challenges faced in the Arctic. It also underscores the necessity of Indigenous-led research to respond to locally defined research priorities.

SSHRC’s current Arctic research initiatives build on the success of our past investments, like ArcticNet and Sentinel North. These projects brought together scientists from various disciplines with partners from northern communities, government agencies and the private sector, as well as international partners, to study the impacts of climate change in the Canadian North.

Through the tri-agency New Frontiers in Research Fund, we are also aligned with the Scandinavian research councils’ collective NordForsk international research initiative on Sustainable Development of the Arctic to further promote large-scale interdisciplinary and collaborative research on the region. This international partnership includes Canada, the United States and several Nordic European countries.

Through the New Frontiers in Research Fund, SSHRC will administer $20 million over four years to create new knowledge for sustainable development of the Arctic. It will expand our understanding of how best to address complex climate change that impacts Canada’s North.

As a condition of joining the program, SSHRC stipulated that Indigenous communities must be involved in the design, development and leadership of any project deemed eligible for funding.

SSHRC also supports Arctic-related research through its core funding on topics such as climate change adaptation and mitigation, energy and resources, sustainable development, geopolitics, food security and many other areas. Between 2018 and mid-2023, SSHRC awarded over $67 million in funding to support northern research, including on Arctic-related topics.

These grants are administered at postsecondary research institutions across Canada—including Yukon University, Nunavut Arctic College and Aurora College in the Northwest Territories.

As mentioned, SSHRC understands that Indigenous rights to self-determination, as they relate to Arctic research, include leadership of, and governance over, research conducted in their communities. This commitment is reinforced through the Strengthening Indigenous Research Capacity initiative, a priority of the Canada Research Coordinating Committee led by SSHRC, which affirms Indigenous knowledge systems, approaches to learning, and means of sharing knowledge.

We have developed a new category of funding eligibility for Indigenous not-for-profit organizations as part of our response to Call to Action 65 of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report.

There are currently 18 eligible Indigenous institutions in this category. These include the Dechinta Centre for Research and Learning, as well as the Inuvialuit Regional Corporation in the Northwest Territories, along with the Qaujigiarttit (pronunciation: Qua-gi-art-tit) Health Research Centre in Nunavut.

Madam Chair, we are determined that Northern researchers and communities, and the institutions that serve them, play a central role in Arctic research, given the direct impacts climate change have on them.

I would be pleased to provide further insights into our Arctic-related research activities during the question-and-answer period.

Thank you.

[ Q&A follows ]

Responsive Lines

N.B. the questions below are based on the three main themes identified in the scope of the study as well as the questions raised by committee members during the first two meetings of the study.

Research on the impact of climate change in the Arctic

Q1. How does SSHRC support research on climate change in the Arctic?
Q2. How do the social sciences and humanities contribute to this area of research?
Q3. How do the granting agencies support large-scale and long-term research in the Arctic? How are projects selected? For example, will the granting agencies continue to support the ArcticNet initiative beyond 2025?

Support for Arctic and northern populations (research funds, infrastructure, tools)

Q4. What does SSHRC do to support postsecondary institutions that serve Arctic and northern populations?

Research collaborations with local and Indigenous communities

Q5. How does SSHRC support research collaborations with Arctic communities?
Q6. In December 2023, the Council of Canadian Academies has published a report entitled “Northern Research Leadership and Equity”. What is SSHRC’s position on the recommendations of the report?

Annexes

  • Annex A: SRSR Committee membership
  • Annex B: Summary of SRSR meetings to date on this study
  • Annex C: Examples of relevant research
  • Annex D: Analysis of the CCA report on “northern research leadership and equity”

Annex A – SRSR Committee Membership

Chair

Valerie Bradford (Kitchener South – Hespler, ON) - LPC
  • Background: First elected in September 2021. Prior to entering politics, she was an economic development professional for the City of Kitchener. Spoke on panel at CSPC in 2022.
  • Interests: Opportunities/gaps in research funding, robotics, sustainable aviation, economic development

Vice-Chairs

Corey Tochor (Saskatoon – University, SK) - CPC
  • Background: Elected as Member of Parliament in 2019. Key focus areas have been: government ac-countability, advancing Canada's energy independence, and fighting against Internet censorship. Mr. Tochor was previously elected to the Saskatchewan legislature in 2011 and 2016. Before entering poli-tics, he was an entrepreneur who owned and operated Health Conveyance.
  • Interests: Canadian nuclear energy; universities
Maxime Blachette-Joncas (Rimouski-NeigetteTémiscouataLes Basques, QC) - BQ
  • Background: Obtained a bachelor's degree in business administration from the Université du Québec à Rimouski. He briefly held a job at the Business Development Bank of Canada, then was hired as deputy director general of the municipality of L'Isle-Verte. Work in the House of Commons has focused on Public Accounts and Tourism.
  • Interests: Investments in R&D and biomanufacturing, support for French language research and publications

Other Members

Liberal Party of Canada
Lloyd Longfield (Guelph, ON)
  • Background: Previously a Mechanical Engineering Technologist, MP Longfield has been serving Guelph for 30 years including 7 years as the President of the Guelph Chamber of Commerce before being elected to Parliament in 2015. He has since served as a member of the Standing Committee for Industry, Science and Technology, as a member of the Standing Committee for Agriculture and Agri-Food, as Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts and as a member of the Standing Committee on the Environment and Sustainable Development.
  • Interests: Environment, housing, mental health, Indigenous reconciliation, early learning, childcare, entrepreneurship and economic development
Helena Jaczek (Markham - Stoufville, ON)
  • Background: First elected in 2019. Minister Responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario and Vice-Chair of the Treasury Board of Canada. Before her work at the federal level, she was the Member of Provincial Parliament for the riding of Oak Ridges-Markham from 2007 to 2018. During that time, Helena served as Ontario’s Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, Chair of Cabinet, Ontario’s Minister of Community and Social Services, Vice-Chair of the Health, Education and Social Policy Cabinet Committee and, from 2011 to 2014, Chair of Liberal Caucus. She also served on the Standing Committee on General Government, the Standing Committee on Social Policy, the Select Committee on Mental Health and Addictions, and the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs.
  • Interests: Health, public health, people living with disabilities.
Lena Metlege Diab (Halifax West, NS)
  • Background: Nova Scotia’s first female Attorney General and Minister of Justice; served as Minister of Immigration, Minister of Labour and Advanced Education, and Ministre des Affaires acadiennes et de la Francophonie. She graduated from Saint Mary's University with a Bachelor of Arts in economics and political science. She also obtained her Master of Public Administration and Bachelor of Laws.
  • Interests: Promoting advancements in science and research, EDI. Strong interest in science through her family (both children work in/study NSE)
Arielle Kayabaga (London West, ON)
  • Background: Elected in 2021, MP Kayabaga is also member of the committee on citizenship and immigration, and was previously a member of the committee on official languages. She was previously elected as Member of Parliament in London and to London City Council. She is Co-Chair of the Global Cooperation Caucus, and the Chair of Liberal Black Caucus.
  • Interests: Housing and homelessness, immigration and citizenship, marginalized populations.
Shaun Chen (Scarborough North, ON)
  • Background: Elected in 2015, MP Chen has served on the Standing Committees on Canadian Heritage, Citizenship and Immigration, Library of Parliament, Public Accounts, and Veterans Affairs. He graduated from Sir John A. Macdonald Collegiate Institute and went on to the University of Toronto, where he received his BSc in computer science and equity studies and MA in sociology in education.
  • Interests: Children and youth, students and education
Conservative Party of Canada
Gerald Soroka (Yellowhead, AB)
  • Background: First elected in 2019. Prior to entering politics, served as Mayor of Yellowhead County. Served on the Standing Committee for COVID-19 Pandemic.
  • Interests: Public safety, freedom of speech
Ben Lobb (Huron-Bruce, ON)
  • Background: MP Lobb holds a Bachelor of Science in business administration from Lee university in Cleveland, Tennessee. Ben currently serves as the shadow minister for digital government and special advisor to the leader of the opposition on blockchain technologies and crypto assets. Previously worked in finance for desire2lean (d2l), an online education platform.
  • Interests: Blockchain technology
Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary-Nose Hill, AB)
  • Background: First elected to parliament in 2011, MP Rempel Garner held the positions of Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment and of Minister of State (Western Economic Diversification) while within the Conservative government. She has served in a number of committee over the years, including the committees on Natural Resources, Citizenship and Immigration, Health, Industry, Science and Technology, and Environment and Sustainable Development.
  • Interests: Innovative academic and business partnerships, technology commercialization, intellectual property management.
New Democratic Party
Richard Cannings (South Okanagan – West Kootenay)
  • Background: Biologist specializing in birds; taught at the UBC for 17 years; current NDP Critic for Emergency Preparedness (Climate Adaptation), as well as Deputy Critic for Natural Resources and Deputy Critic for Innovation, Science and Industry; previously appointed NDP critic for Post-Secondary Education and Deputy Critic for Natural Resources. His father was also renowned environmentalist Stephen Cannings.
  • Interests: student advocacy, Climate change, energy, oil and gas, fossil fuel subsidies, softwood lumber and forestry, natural resources

Annex B – Summary of SRSR Meetings to Date on This Study

Meeting on May 9, 2024
Witness opening remarks

Michel Allard, Professor Emeritus, Center for Northern Studies, Laval University

  • Underscored the urgent need for comprehensive research and planning to address the multifaceted challenges posed by the thawing of permafrost which is compounding an already serious housing crisis.

Tom Henheffer, Chief Executive Officer, Arctic Research Foundation

  • Canada lacks a cohesive cross-departmental holistic national strategy for the Arctic. Climate change is not the only issue confronted by the North. China is increasing its holdings in the northern territory. The United States denies Canada’s claim to sovereignty over the northwest passage, while Russian submarines are testing the boundaries of Canadian waters.

Angus Cockney, Community Engagement and Northern Specialist, Arctic Research Foundation

  • As a member of the Inuit community, he shared that community members are very concerned about a number of items including coastal erosion. He called for a National Arctic Strategy.

Christine Barnard, Executive Director, ArcticNet

  • Pressing need to address the impacts of climate change and biodiversity loss in the North. Crucial role of traditional knowledge in acknowledging and respecting its significance in supporting northern communities. Challenges facing Arctic research, including the necessity for extended timeframes, substantial cash investments and relationship building. Acknowledged the growing emphasis on investing in Indigenous-led research in the North but cautioned that such efforts require time and significant investments. Capacity varies across the Arctic, with each region having distinct priorities and aspirations.

Jackie Dawson, Canada Research Chair in Human and Policy Dimensions of Climate Change, University of Ottawa and Scientific Director, ArcticNet

  • Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has meant that large portion of the Arctic is now unavailable for research and has meant that many European researchers have moved to the Canadian Arctic. Climate change in Canada will have enormous impact around the globe because of the cascading biophysical effects it will have on society. Called for an Arctic Science Strategy with sustained long-term financial support. She asserted that the lack of leadership in this space has already caused geopolitical and diplomatic challenges.

Normand Voyer, Center for Northern Studies, Université Laval

  • Canadian North does not have the resources, tools and funding needed for research. Communities lack financial human and tools to address immediate concern and capacity development is urgently needed. Concern that relevant research is not effectively being selected.
Committee member questions
  • Is northern research adequately funded and what changes would you make in alignment to the local needs? What should the Federal government priorities be for the north? Are we spreading our resources too thin in the Arctic?
  • How do you build relationships with communities as they are very varied throughout the country? How can we be more effective?
  • How research is different in the Arctic? How we can we support research in the Arctic in light of the smaller network of post-secondary institutions?
  • Given the large number of organizations involved in Arctic research – How do you avoid duplication? How are you disseminating information by everyone involved?
  • To what extend are research organizations incorporating Indigenous knowledge?
  • What is the repercussion of the permafrost? How can we prepare and adapt? How can we work with our closer allies?
  • Accessibility challenges exist as well. Can you give us some examples? What are the access challenges for research?
Meeting on May 21, 2024
Witnesses

Richard Boudreault, Adjunct Professor, University of Waterloo, Polytechnique Montréal and CSMC

  • The Arctic is warming at a rate three times faster than Canada. Canada in turn is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet. There are seven risk vectors: (1) polar ice melting, (2) permafrost methane, (3) warming the boreal forest, (4) changes to the Atlantic Gulf Stream, (5) the freeing of the Northwest passage, (6) polar vortex changing temperatures across North America, and (7) rising temp of oceans. Canada requires up to 15 times more researchers than we do to address the challenges of the North.

Andrew Derocher, Professor of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta

  • Acknowledged the vital role of the Polar Continental Shelf Program of Natural Resources Canada. There is a lack of funding and infrastructure for sustained Arctic research. Limited avenues to connect researchers with communities and research opportunities. Joint research involving various levels of government, stakeholders, and universities is crucial for maximizing research outcomes.

William Quinton, Professor, Wilfrid Laurier University

  • Disappearance of permafrost has a great impact on water resources, ecology, ecosystems and other. For example, people in the NWT are experiencing warmer and shorter winters, changes in precipitation regimes that impact rivers and stream flows, droughts, floods, and wildfires.
Committee member questions
  • Would you support a recommendation for the government to place greater emphasis on concrete adaptation strategies as well as an Arctic and Northern strategy?
  • How are universities ensuring that research in the Arctic is conducted in a manner that respects the rights and priorities of local communities?
  • Do other countries in the Polar region spend more in research? What are the consequences of not supporting Northern research?
  • About Polar Continental Shelf funding: how important it is and where does the funding stand at the moment?
  • What is the status of Polar Bears in the North? How is climate change affecting their environment?
  • How are we doing in monitoring methane in Canada? Impact of the wildfires in the Arctic?

Annex C – Examples of relevant research

Canada First Excellence Research Fund

2022 Competition

Qanittaq Clean Arctic Shipping Initiative
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Partner institutions: University of Ottawa

Award amount: $91,551,679 over seven years

The Qanittaq Clean Arctic Shipping Initiative is a unique partnership, co-led and co-developed by Memorial University and the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) Canada, to address and respond to concerns about Arctic shipping and related environmental impacts affecting Northern communities. It will develop robust and innovative ship design and operation technologies, as well as surrounding policy and governance to position Canada and Inuit as world leaders in Arctic shipping.

2015 Competition

Sentinel North
Université Laval

Award Amount: $98,021,000 over seven years (award has ended but the initiative is active)

Sentinel North will build on the Université Laval’s cutting-edge capacity in Arctic sciences, optics-photonics, and cardiometabolic and brain health. This multisector initiative will explore critical components of the coupled human-environment system, and will create transformative technologies to support sustainable development and health in the vast Canadian North.

Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada (transitioned into NFRF)

ArcticNet

Headquarters: Université Laval / University of Ottawa

$146.2 million for 2003-25

ArcticNet represents Canada’s largest commitment to date to explore the social, economic and environmental impacts of climate change and modernization on the Canadian North. Since 2004, ArcticNet has established the research, connections and experience to understand the challenges the North faces. Through a network of partnerships, ArcticNet is transforming how research is conducted in the North with inclusive research conducted with and by northerners.

NSERC-funded CERCs and Canada 150 Research Chair

Researcher Chair Title Description University

Dahl-Jensen, Dorthe

Canada Excellence Research Chair in Arctic Ice, Freshwater Marine Coupling and Climate Change

Generate transformative knowledge, allowing policy-makers, communities, industry and co-management groups to create informed sustainable development, adaptation and mitigation strategies needed to address both the unprecedented challenges and opportunities of the opening of Canada’s Arctic Ocean.

University of Manitoba

Myers-Smith, Isla

Canada Excellence Research Chair in Global Change Ecology of Northern Ecosystems

Integrate field research, remote sensing, data synthesis and community engagement to address critical research questions about northern ecosystems experiencing rapid and accelerating climate change, and the resulting implications for northern communities.

The University of British Columbia

Stroeve, Julienne Christine

Canada 150 Research Chair in Climate Sea Ice Coupling

Use satellite and in situ data, Inuit traditional knowledge, community monitoring, and climate models to improve our understanding of how changes in sea ice contribute to the large-scale coupling of freshwater and the Arctic Ocean.

University of Manitoba

SSHRC-funded Canada Research Chairs

Researcher Chair Title Description University

Byers, Michael

Canada Research Chair in Global Politics and International Law

Examining the interaction of international politics and international law on such topics as the Arctic, United States-Canada relations and international organizations.

The University of British Columbia

Compton, Richard J.

Transmission and Knowledge of the Inuit Language

Collaborate with Inuit communities and organizations to collect culturally appropriate documentary data to describe two dialect groups: Inuktitut and Inuinnaqtun.

Université du Québec à Montréal

Dawson, Jackie

Canada Research Chair in The Human and Policy Dimensions of Climate Change

Examining the human and policy elements of environmental change with a focus on Arctic oceans and maritime transportation.

University of Ottawa

Duhaime, Gérard

Canada Research Chair in Comparative Aboriginal Conditions

Studying the social, economic and political conditions of contemporary Aboriginal People and of inhabitants of the circumpolar region.

Université Laval

Lackenbauer, Whitney

Canada Research Chair in the Study of the Canadian North

Examining the historical and contemporary forces that shape how we understand the Canadian and circumpolar Norths.

Trent University

Ljubicic, Gita J

Canada Research Chair in Community-Engaged Research for Northern Sustainability

Exploring how community-engaged research can contribute to sustainability in the North

McMaster University             

McMaster, Gerald

Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Visual Culture and Curatorial Practice

Exploring indigenous views of historic settler populations; studying distant, internationally renowned art-producing communities; and connecting Arctic and Amazonian voices to environmental issues.

OCAD University

Szpak, Paul

Canada Research Chair in Environmental Archaeology

Analyzing the bones and teeth of marine mammals to understand how Arctic ecosystems have changed over the last 12,000 years due to climatic variation and human activity.

Trent University

Wilson, Nicole J.

Canada Research Chair in Arctic Environmental Change and Governance

Exploring how Indigenous people in the Arctic are navigating environmental change in unequal social-ecological systems.

University of Manitoba

SSHRC Partnership and Insight Grants

CY FO Project Title Researcher Admin Org

2023

IG

Médiation interculturelle et conflits ontologiques dans le milieu de la justice au Nunavik (Arctique québécois)

Hervé, Caroline

Université Laval

2023

IG

Scoping and Storying Food Governance in Inuit Nunangat

McClintock, Nathan

Institut national de la recherche scientifique

2021

IG

Making research work for Nunavummiut: Rethinking community consultation and engagement to enhance Inuit self-determination in research

Ljubicic, Gita

McMaster University

2020

PG

Le partenariat circumpolaire WAGE – L'économie arctique et les transitions sociales

Duhaime, Gérard

Université Laval

2020

IG

Housing Nunavut for all Ages

Sheppard, Lola

University of Waterloo

2019

PG

Northern Oral Language and Writing through Play: A Partnership Supporting Indigenous Children's Language, Cultural Knowledge and Writing

Stagg Peterson, Shelley

University of Toronto

Annex D – Analysis of the CCA Report on “Northern Research Leadership and Equity”

N.B. Karla Jessen Williamson is a member of the SSHRC Indigenous Advisory Circle and was one of the co-authors of the CCA report (PDF document, 13.2 MB). Gita Ljubicic, SSHRC-funded Canada Research Chair in Community-Engaged Research for Northern Sustainability, was also a co-author.

Key elements

Recommendations and corresponding SSHRC and Tri-agency actions

N.B. The SSHRC Indigenous Advisory Circle asked SSHRC staff to provide background information on the agency’s current research policies, programs, processes and practices as they relate to the report’s recommendations for funders. The following is background information for the Circle, for discussion purposes, and not an official response to the report.

Recommendations for All Actors
  • Creating a cohesive, long-term vision for Arctic and Northern research to enable just and effective investment.
  • Affirming and respecting Indigenous knowledge systems and leadership to ensure balance among knowledge systems in Northern research.
  • Affirming and supporting diverse educational approaches, including on-the-Land learning and oral information sharing.

Through alignment with the Tri-Agency Strengthening Indigenous research capacity initiative and its goals to support relationships with Indigenous Peoples, support the research priorities of Indigenous peoples and to create greater funding accessibility for Indigenous researchers, SSHRC supports Arctic and Northern peoples in the development of a long-term vision for research and training. In its definition of Indigenous research, SSHRC affirms and respects Indigenous knowledge systems, approaches to learning, and means of sharing knowledge. Indigenous rights to self-determination include leadership of and governance over research conducted in their communities.

Recommendations for Funders
  • Developing flexible funding programs that are tailored to the Northern context, allowing for the time and resources needed for relationship-building.

At present, funding opportunities are not specifically designed for research in the North. When possible, SSHRC has shown flexibility in adapting the terms and conditions of funding to suit the unique circumstances of researchers.  For example, SSHRC developed tools and processes to help merit review committees accurately and equitably consider the impacts of career interruptions and special circumstances (e.g. health, administrative, family or other reasons) on a candidate’s record of research productivity. During the COVID-19 pandemic, funding deadlines were extended. Recently, the Tri-Agency Guide on Financial Administration was updated to explicitly state that Indigenous people participating in research projects may be financially compensated, in the form of an eligible expense and subject to program terms and conditions, from grant funds, including Indigenous knowledge holders, guides and other research collaborators. Time scales of 7-8 years are typical in larger institutional programs run by SSHRC for the Tri-Agencies, such as Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF) and the Canada Excellence Research Chairs (CERC) program, with the stated goals of developing significant and meaningful partnerships and collaborations beyond institutional settings and increasing the capacity for knowledge mobilization for greater societal benefits. SSHRC’s research programs, policies, and practices are designed with the goal of being accessible to all, with the recognition that different contexts create different realities for researchers across Canada. While the agency operates within certain constraints beyond its control (e.g. federal funding timelines), SSHRC is willing to explore ways to better support research in the Northern context.

  • Expanding eligibility criteria to researchers outside the academic sphere to promote Indigenous-led and culturally safe research.

As part of its response to Call to Action 65 of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report, SSHRC developed a new category of funding eligibility for Indigenous not-for-profit organizations based in Canada. Eligible groups can administer funding for multiple Connection Grants, Partnership Grants (PG), and Partnership Development Grants (PDG), and Knowledge Synthesis Grants (KSG) and can renew their Institutional Eligibility status for five years at a time, eliminating the need to re-apply with each proposal. There are presently 18 eligible Indigenous institutions of this category including the Dechinta Centre for Research and Learning (NWT), Inuvialuit Regional Corporation (NWT), and Qaujigiartiit Health Research Centre (Nunavut). This category is the newest among four types of institutional eligibility, an approach that has now been harmonized across all three agencies. Indigenous not-for-profit organizations not seeking Institutional Eligibility status have the option of participating as PG and PDG co-directors or co-applicants. The New Frontiers in Research Fund (NFRF) has flexible eligibility criteria that allows people from outside of academia to be eligible as co-principal investigators and co-applicants, specifically designed to foster co-developed and co-led projects with Indigenous communities. Institutional grants (CFREF and CERC) require the establishment of “significant partnerships and collaborations” with different entities, such as Indigenous Peoples and communities, through co-designed research. CFREF recognizes the unique skills and knowledge possessed by Indigenous community members as qualification for membership in the core team, even if they are not formally affiliated with the lead academic institution.

  • Ensuring that Indigenous Peoples hold influence over research funding decisions that concern their communities and their Lands. Having specialized funding streams that support Indigenous-led research, including capacity-building, in an accessible and culturally secure way.

At present, SSHRC has dedicated funding to build capacity in research trainees through the Indigenous Scholars Award and the Indigenous Scholars Supplement (Master’s students). The Canada Research Chairs (CRCs) Program sets goals for the percentage of Indigenous CRCs, which has risen from 0.4% in 2009 to 4.1% in 2023. The recent partnership between SSHRC and the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation, to establish a Reconciliation Network in Response to Call to Action 65, was designated for research projects led by First Nations, Métis Nation or Inuit researchers as applicant / project director. Moving forward, SSHRC’s principles for Indigenous research and the Tri-Agency strategy Setting New Directions (SIRC) provide a framework to support and further advance Indigenous-led research. Any alternate granting mechanisms would require new cabinet authorities.

  • Increasing funding opportunities for Northern post-secondary institutions and research organizations.

SSHRC institutional funding opportunities are available to post-secondary institutions. These are not presently prioritized by region. SSHRC grants to researchers are administered at post-secondary research institutions across Canada, including those in the North, such as Yukon University, Nunavut Arctic College and Aurora College, which hold full institutional eligibility with SSHRC. Between 2018 and mid-2023, SSHRC awarded over $67 million in funding to support northern research, including on Arctic-related topics.

  • Supporting transdisciplinary and collaborative approaches to address critical Indigenous research priorities.

SSHRC strives to support transdisciplinary and collaborative approaches as they are articulated in the Guidelines for the Merit Review of Indigenous Research, which calls reviewers to ensure that “Indigenous research incorporating Indigenous knowledge systems (including ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies) are recognized as a scholarly contribution,” and reminds reviewers that Indigenous research must “respect relevant community research protocols” and be characterized by a “deep level of collaboration” which may include “learning within language and/or traditional knowledge systems.” These principles contained in the guidelines are used to assess submissions to all programs in SSHRC’s Insight Research and the Research Partnership portfolios.

  • Committee 21 welcomes research proposals in any SSHRC-eligible academic field or domain of knowledge that is grounded in Indigenous knowledge or related to Indigenous Peoples. It is a multidisciplinary committee composed of Indigenous and non-Indigenous members who are specialists in Indigenous research.
  • For other committees, if an application is identified as Indigenous research, the Guidelines for the Merit Review of Indigenous Research are used for the review of the application.
  • All NFRF-funded research projects are inter/multi/transdisciplinary. Many funding opportunities require a co-development and co-leadership model with communities.
  • CFREF calls for interdisciplinary and intersectional research. The 2022 competition calls for the integration of “Indigenous research components and Indigenous ways of knowing to extend research knowledge in the field that is significant to First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples and communities. This research must be co-created and co-led with Indigenous Peoples, as leaders, investigators, trainees, partners and collaborators, using a distinction-based approach.”
  • As the above applies to CERC, institutions are expected to support nominees in integrating Indigenous research into their program. For both CFREF and CERC, a rationale is requested if the application states that no aspect of the research may benefit from the inclusion of Indigenous research components.
  • Streamlining and simplifying funding applications to reduce the burden on individuals and communities.

SSHRC recognizes the need to simplify the application process and reduce administrative burdens. Reforms have proved challenging, due to the current reliance on legacy computer systems. Acknowledging such constraints, SSHRC only collects information required to support the merit review process. A frictionless process, however, is not the goal. Streamlining requires balancing several considerations. For example, in 2018 the process for new research partner organizations was simplified, replacing the “create an account” step with a simple invitation link. The new partner is led to a form requesting information required by reviewers to assess the genuineness of the proposed research partnership. This step cannot be reduced to a checkbox. Reviewers require adequate information to be confident that research will respect the principles in the Guidelines.

  • Supporting coherence and transparency of research funding sources to enable effective and equitable distribution of resources.
  • Ensuring there is ongoing monitoring of the economic and social outcomes of research to promote accountability.

All SSHRC funding recipients must submit achievement reports on their research outcomes and impacts. Partnership grant award holders ($2.5m over seven years) undergo a mid-term review process and the continuation of their funding depends upon an assessment by an external review committee. Research Partnership portfolio has a questionnaire for partner organizations, to better understand the impacts of the research project on the partners. This questionnaire is submitted directly to SSHRC, not through the project director. After the end of a grant period, SSHRC does not conduct ongoing monitoring of impacts.

  • Prioritizing social accountability in research processes, outcomes, and evaluations to reflect the collaborative nature of Arctic and Northern research.

SSHRC incentivizes greater social accountability in research practice through our policies, processes and practices to award grants. For example, merit reviewers rank proposals based on criteria such as the following: “Community involvement and the co-creation of knowledge” and “The application should demonstrate how outputs will be made available to, and potentially used by, Indigenous peoples and other stakeholders, with community benefits configured into the research outputs.” Community accountability is integrated into the evaluation criteria of an applicant’s research plan.

  • Ensuring all researchers (domestic and international) comply with existing guidance and ethical protocols on how to carry out research projects in ways that appropriately consult, collaborate with, and benefit Indigenous Peoples.
  • Prioritizing partnerships with international funders that comply with existing guidance on carrying out research projects with Indigenous Peoples.

The Canada Research Coordinating Committee (CRCC) has developed an International Framework for global research partnerships. This statement does not contain an explicit reference to research projects with Indigenous peoples, but it does list principles including integrity and inclusion, and exists in alignment with other Tri-Agency policies. And while few of Canada’s international partners (funding bodies) currently possess comparable Indigenous research policies, this provides Canada with an opportunity to champion wider adoption of such standards, comparable to Canada’s inclusive trade policy, which successfully negotiated gender and Indigenous chapters in international trade agreements. For example, SSHRC stressed the importance of the inclusion of “Indigenous perspectives” in the research call for the recently announced NordForsk-led international initiative on Sustainable Development of the Arctic (2024). The ArcticNet initiative (CIHR, NSERC, SSHRC $146.2M from 2003-2025) established a Network of Centres of Excellence, with 175 researchers from 33 Canadian universities who are engaging partners from Inuit organizations and northern communities, and who have collaborated with researchers in Denmark, Finland, France, Greenland, Japan, Norway, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the USA. ArcticNet funds the Inuit Research Management Committee and the Inuit Qaujisarnirmut Pilirijjutit.

  • Offering ongoing support to enable Northern and/or Indigenous-led organizations to continue providing critical leadership, guidance, support, and research services.

The granting agencies do not currently have the mandate or means to provide ongoing operational support for research organizations. SSHRC staff can provide guidance and assistance regarding research funding opportunities administered by SSHRC.

Page details

From:

Date modified: